a5c7b9f00b With the emerging demand of hyperfuel and other resources, Han Solo finds himself in the middle of a heist alongside other criminals, where they meet the likes of Chewbacca and Lando Calrissian in an adventurous situation exposing the criminal underworld.
During an adventure into the criminal underworld, Han Solo meets his future copilot Chewbacca and encounters Lando Calrissian years before joining the Rebellion.
I think it is important to know a movie context in order to evaluate it. This project has suffered a lot of problems in its making: director change, massive reshoots, budget increase, any image 3 months before its release, etc. I also didn't understand the need of this movie until a person who saw Episode IV in 1977 told me it would be great to see a movie of Han Solo's young adventures. It changed my point of view. With all these things, I went to cinema without any high expectations, just trying to enjoy the following two hours. I almost managed it.<br/><br/>For the 95% of the time, I found what I expected: entertainment. Because I don't understand the high expectations with this movie. This movie is just a funny addition to Star Wars, to put image to those stories Han Solo told in the original trilogy. And it manages it. The atmosphere feels like the Star Wars universe. Creatures, weapons, environments, vehicles, everything is correct. <br/><br/>There are quite interesting scenes, like the battle in mud, the train assault, or the very anticipated Kessel Run. Casting is correct, Ehrenreich and Glover do feel like young versions of the characters. Emilia Clarke does a decent job with her mischievous smile, hiding dark secrets, and they are powered with always good Paul Bettany and Woody Harrelson. Even the strange characters go dying for the sake of the movie. Also humour was well controled after Guardians of the Galaxy tone threat.<br/><br/>Everything is going just ok. But unfortunately, things got wrong at the end. The last 10 minutes spoiled it all. They made a mistake I couldn't tolerate.<br/><br/>Why Darth Maul had to appear at the end? Since Episode I, i have seen a lot of fanboys trying to get it back form the dead, bringing crazy ideas one after another. I was aware that Clone Wars and Rebels took him back, but all that things aren't important beacause Star Wars are movies, and other things are extra stuff. But this appearance the movie gives validity to all that crazy ideas. Why we can't afford Darth Maul was a decent villain a stop it there? <br/><br/>This bad handled effective strike attempt only can confuse that people that always liked Star Wars but are not aware of comics, videogames, animation series, etc. This was a limit I wouldn't tolerate the day it happened, and so it was. The idea of Qi'ra having dirty deeds with the Dark Side to get out Corellia is cool, but Darth Maul was dead, beacuse if you are cut in half and thrown form 100 meters high, you are dead, no matter how powerful you are. The idea he survived 10 years being half a spider is just pathetic. Even the Emperor could have been a better cameo there.<br/><br/>Also Enfys Nest and the riders, that seemed threatening and dangerous, lost everything just for another effective strike attempt, to show they were only angry children and slaves. At least they say the will join the rebellion.<br/><br/>To end, the movie is just correct at 95%. There is my 6/10. But this is not a trascendent movie about Light and Darkness, and father and sons. This is just entertaining. Consequently I don't understand why Lucasfilm bases its box office results to decide about the future of Star Wars saga. The movie had a lot of problems in the making and its not a masterpiece, so I find fair its box office results, and they are no reason to freeze other 'A Star Wars story' projects. The nowadays principle of quantity=quality is not a good analysis tool. After four films of this new era, this movement seems to show us that there are no stories to tell, only the making money machine on, and that money is the only thing that matters. That is not Star Wars.
I am a fan of Star Wars and have been since I saw Darth Vadara little boy when The original came out in 1977. I thoroughly enjoyed Solo, had good action and comedy; acting was real good. I was worried about GloverLando, am just a fan of how Billy Dee played the character, but Glover did very well and I liked the characterwell. Many negative things are being said, and I know there were things I did not like about Last Jedi story, but all things considered, I have enjoyed all the movies and have good entertainment watching them, multiple times. Should not be so hard on this movie, the actors did well and movie was well worth the time and money to see.
While the movie ends in a way that’s clearly designed to prompt further sequels, we don’t get that prequel X factor that makes us interested in a character arc whose outcome we already know. “Better Call Saul” knows how to do this; “Solo” doesn’t.
Unknown. However, it's somewhat likely that Jabba had been a client of Han's for a long time.
Eurocrime! The Italian Cop and Gangster Films That Ruled the '70s full movie in hindi free download mp4Action Jackson movie in hindi hd free downloadFatal Rhapsody full movie hd 1080p downloadtamil movie Episode 1.247 free downloadKill Zone torrentLost in Space in tamil pdf downloaddownload Beast of Burden2042 movie mp4 downloadBatman: Arkham Origins tamil pdf downloadtamil movie dubbed in hindi free download The Recovery